Comment on [deleted]
scarabic@lemmy.world 11 months agoIt seems you do not understand. Tech companies do everything they can to ensure that terrorists and hostile regimes do not use their service. When ISIS communicate on Facebook, that puts Facebook in jeopardy with the government. Negligence on this is the best thing Facebook can do to invite Congress in to regulate them. I’m not saying that every company does a perfect job or even a good job but to say that removing Hamas content is new or special in any way… yeah you just haven’t seen the inside of a major company’s trust and safety team. If Hamas is prioritized more than last year, maybe it’s because they’ve removed any ambiguity about whether they are the elected authorities in Gaza or terrorists. They’re also probably waging more intense information campaigns than ever since their attack was designed to stir their supporters and put them in conflict with Israel. Yeah, fuck Hamas. If you want to cry censorship, find someone worth defending.
Eheran@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You really need to stop making straw mans. Read what I said, not what you think I said. I gave a specific example of what was discussed. No more and no less.
scarabic@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You said that disallowing Hamas produced video is an example of suppression of free speech and constitutes “absurd censorship.”
Eheran@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Mate, you must be confusing me with someone else.
scarabic@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Or someone has stolen your account. Yellow is what you replied to. Red is you.
Image