Why would they? It’s not like it’s going to be bringing customers to their other services and Google isn’t a charity.
Comment on YouTube warns it might make your viewing experience worse if you don't turn off your ad-blocker
Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 7 months agoSubsidise it with your other services
Nilz@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 months ago
They’re not a charity, they’re a monopoly. So fuck them I don’t care how people circumvent their increasingly shitty service
BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 7 months ago
"Just don't worry about revenue at all" is the best kind of secret genius business strategy that I come to Lemmy for.
PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 7 months ago
From a financial standpoint, that doesn’t make any sense though. Why would you continue to run a service that is a net drain on the rest of your business? Unless it can offer some meaningful, tangible benefit to the company, why continue to operate it at all? If a service needs to be subsidized to survive, why does it need to survive?
Google has basically used it to increase their tracking capabilities across the web. They know when you visit any site with an embedded YouTube video. But that’s only possible because they’re already a massive company. And it’s not reasonable to expect them to continue subsidizing it out of the goodness of their hearts. After all, if you’re willing to ask them to subsidize it, why aren’t you willing to help by paying for premium? It’s easy to say “just subsidize it” when it’s not your money.
To be clear, I don’t pay for premium and probably never will. But this thread has a lot of emotionally charged “because I want it” responses, which aren’t really grounded in reality. YouTube has operated at a loss for a decade, and only continued to operate because it had the backing of a tech giant. But if that tech giant wants to stop subsidizing the site and finally make the site profitable, that’s their prerogative. Yes, it’s the final step in the enshittification process. Yes, it means free users will have a worse experience. But ultimately, the company isn’t required to care about the free users.
decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works 7 months ago
If YouTube operates at a loss and they decide to ditch their service its their problem, not mine. I’m not here to save google