Comment

Comment on Over half of all tech industry workers view AI as overrated

I remember when it first came out I asked it to help me write a MapperConfig custom strategy and the answer it gave me was so fantastically wrong - even with prompting - that I lost an afternoon. Honestly the only useful thing I’ve found for it is getting it to find potential syntax errors in terraform code that the plan might miss. It doesn’t even complement my programming skills like a traditional search engine can do; instead it assumes a solution that is usually wrong and you are left to try to build your house on the boilercode sand it spits out at you.

source

Sort:hotnew top

locuester@lemmy.zip ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Have you used copilot? I find it to be fantastically useful.

source
lloram239@feddit.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
It’s a general problem with ChatGPT(free), the more obscure the topic, the more useless the answers will be. It works pretty good for Wikipedia-style general knowledge, but everything that goes even a little deeper is a mess. This is true even when it comes to things that shouldn’t be that obscure, e.g. pop-culture things like movies. It can give you a summary of StarWars, but anything even a little more outside the mainstream it makes up on the spot.

How much better is ChatGPT-Pro when it comes to this? Can it answer /r/tipofmytongue/ style question?

source
- applebusch@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I’ve found the free one can sometimes answer tip of my tongue questions but yeah anything even remotely obscure it will just lie and say that doesn’t exist, especially if you stray a little too close to the puritanical guard rails. One time I was going down a rabbit hole researching human sex organ variations and it flat out told me the people in South America who grow a penis at 12 don’t exist until I found the name guevedoces on my own, and wouldn’t you know it then it knew what I was talking about.
  
  source
phoneymouse@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I also have tried to use it to help with programming problems, and it is confidently incorrect a high percentage (50%) of the time. It will fabricate package names, functions, and more. When you ask it to correct itself, it will give another confidently incorrect answer. Do this a few more times and you could end up with it suggesting the first incorrect answer it gave you and then you realize it is literally leading you in circles.

It’s definitely a nice option to check something quickly, and it has given me some good information, but you really can’t blindly trust its output.

source