Terms and conditions that are illegal ate not valid and this goes against the first sale doctrine
Comment on Tesla will sue you for $50,000 if you try to resell your Cybertruck in the first year
Vorticity@lemmy.world 7 months agoI’m guessing it’s in the terms and conditions when you buy the vehicle. In which case I’d say that Tesla is within their rights. If you don’t like the terms, don’t buy the car.
averyfalken@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 months ago
cheesebag@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Imagine applying this argument to an employment contact. “Tesla’s contract says you don’t get bathroom breaks & have to work in unsafe conditions. If you don’t like it, don’t work there”. Clearly doesn’t hold water. In the US, we need stronger consumer protections - right to repair, right to be forgotten, and right to safely do what you like with your own property.
assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Terms and conditions have been voided before, including NDA clauses. It’s why they always have a severability clause, stating that if any parts of the T&C are found invalid, the rest of the T&C remain in place.
There’s no way this sticks
Tankton@lemm.ee 7 months ago
Simply referring to terms and conditions when complaining about a company move is such a weak argument. Honestly half of the terms are void by European laws anyway.