Comment on ISP put me behind NAT
nucleative@lemmy.world 1 year agoThis. I had the same situation being put behind CGnat and told them my security webcam needs port forwarding from outside and they had me back to a public IP within minutes.
Comment on ISP put me behind NAT
nucleative@lemmy.world 1 year agoThis. I had the same situation being put behind CGnat and told them my security webcam needs port forwarding from outside and they had me back to a public IP within minutes.
nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
ISPs in Canada usually include a clause in their TOS that explicitly prohibits selfhosting. Don’t move here, it sucks.
nucleative@lemmy.world 1 year ago
🫤 that does suck. Probably so they can charge more for a hosted package?
nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
It’s to push users into getting commercial accounts.
tal@lemmy.today 1 year ago
I dunno. The IPv4 address space is getting pretty tight, and aside from rejiggering existing inefficient allocations, there’s not a lot you can do beyond NAT.
In the US, we had it pretty good for a long time, because we had a rather disproportionate chunk of the IPv4 address space – Ford, MIT, and Apple alone each had their own Class A netblock, about half a percent of the Internet’s address space each, for example.
But things have steadily gotten tighter as more and more of the world uses the Internet more and more.
whatismyipaddress.com/ipv6-ready
olafurp@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I don’t know Canada laws but does it only apply if you make money off it (or intend to). Self hosting Jellyfin server is basically just delayed uploading.
nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Afaik it’s at the ISP’s digression. Up until I switched, Bell would block ports 21, 22, 53, 80 and 443.
olafurp@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s pretty nice compromise. 80 and 443 are the ones mainly used commercially