Comment on ISP put me behind NAT
poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 year agoAnd if not I would cancle the contract with them as CGNAT is not an internet connection and we could not just accept this crap.
Comment on ISP put me behind NAT
poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 year agoAnd if not I would cancle the contract with them as CGNAT is not an internet connection and we could not just accept this crap.
Schmeckinger@feddit.de 1 year ago
Good luck getting a non CGNAT connection here sithout paying for it. Also it’s not a breach of contract if it’s not in the contract…
poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
If they sell an “internet connection” then selling one behind a CGNAT is a breach of contract, because it is not a connection to the internet but only a selective forwarding service from within their intranet.
Similar to how the consumer protection agencies fought against fake speed promises and hidden “fair use” volume clauses, CGNAT should also be forbidden to be advertised as “internet”.
Schmeckinger@feddit.de 1 year ago
We have more internet connections than IPv4’s they can’t just pull new ones out of their ass.
poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
This is a myth. There are large swath of IPv4 address spaces totally unused and many ISPs hoard them without actually using them.
An IPv6 only internet connection would also still be miles better than CGNAT connection.