Mind. Blown.
Comment on Isn't it convenient that the alphabet is in alphabetical order.
TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Dude: numbers are in NUMERICAL ORDER!
Arrakis@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Comment on Isn't it convenient that the alphabet is in alphabetical order.
TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Dude: numbers are in NUMERICAL ORDER!
Mind. Blown.
someguy3@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
Numbers have a logical order. The alphabet is effectively random, but we take this random sequence so seriously we take it as a definition.
TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 11 months ago
“Effectively Random” how? Every culture for more than 2,000 years have structured their sequence.
I. We have given letters a hierarchy since early times. Christ said he was the Alpha and Omega, meaning the beginning and end, as those were the first and last letters in the Greek alphabet. This structure was true then and now.
II. The Romans used letters as numbers. I V X L C M D – long before ASCII assigned letters numerical values.
III. If your argument is that we could have chosen to load the beginning with vowels and then the end with letters, well, we didn’t have alphabetical order until we placed the letters in sequence. If we “randomly chose” a different sequence, then that sequence would have been our alphabetical order. The Greek Z is Zeta, not Omega.
Image
someguy3@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
That’s what I’m saying and that’s the whole point. Numbers can’t be rearranged like that (bases are interesting).
Arrakis@lemmy.world 11 months ago
TL;DR wooooooosh