Comment

Comment on Child psychiatrist jailed after using AI to make pornographic deep-fakes of kids

<- View Parent

papertowels@lemmy.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

Your claims backbone is that models don’t know the differences between a child’s naked body and an adults, yes?

What happens if you ask chat gpt “what are the anatomical differences between human and adult bodies?”

I’m sure it’ll give you an accurate response.

source

Sort:hotnew top

mayoi@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Oh wow a text model built from text written by humans can parrot what text written by humans says…

Now get it to write something original.

source
- Player2@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Just like all the words you used to compose that sentence already existed and yet you made it yourself, language models can take tokens that they know generally go together and make original sentences. Your argument is that a dictionary exists, therefore authors are lying to everyone by saying that they wrote something.
  
  source
  - Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Hey, just so you know, this guy is a crazy troll. He’s clocked 130 comments on his 9 hr old profile, and almost all of them are picking fights and deflecting. Save yourself the trouble. His goto line is “I don’t remember that”
    
    source
  - mayoi@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    
    Your argument is that a dictionary exists, therefore authors are lying to everyone by saying that they wrote something.
    
    Don’t remember saying that authors are lying about anything.
    
    source
- Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  👆 Sarcasm and condescension
  
  source
Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
You genuinely don’t think CSAM is used in the training of these AI models…? And then you used a chat model to essentially google the differences in text and not visually?..

Why did you feel the need to jump in and defend stuff like this?

source
- Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Didnt they then post a link showing that dall-e could combine two different things into something its never seen before?
  
  Did you read the whole comment? Even if the text model describing things is irrelevant the dall-e part is not.
  
  source
  - Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    It is irrelevant. Armchairs are not people. Dali does not know what is inside of those objects. Or under their fabrics for instance. Ask Dali to cut open the Avacado armchair.
    
    I’m sorry if I’m not buying your defense of CSAM.
    
    But the Dali use case of “an illustration of a baby daikon radish in a tutu walking a dog" can’t possibly be the best example to use here to defend child porn.
    
    source
    lolcatnip@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    
    I’m sorry if I’m not buying your defense of CSAM.
    
    Thanks for making it clear you’re arguing in bad faith.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
    Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Im sorry? My defense of CSAM?
    
    What defence of CSAM?
    
    Do you require mental assistance? You appear to be having some kind of aneurism…
    
    source
- papertowels@lemmy.one ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  The original comment said it’s impossible for a model to be able to produce CP if it was never exposed to it.
  
  They were uninformed, so as someone who works with machine learning I informed them. If your argument relies on ignorance it’s bad.
  
  Re: text model, someone already addressed this. If you’re going to make arguments and assumptions about things I share without reading them, there’s no need for me to bother with my time. You can lead a horse to water but you cant make it drink.
  
  Have a good one!
  
  source