Comment on Child psychiatrist jailed after using AI to make pornographic deep-fakes of kids
papertowels@lemmy.one 10 months agoJust chipping in with a technicical answer - a model can know what thing A is, also be shown a thing B, and compose the two. Otherwise models would never be able to display anything that doesn’t exist yet.
In this particular case, there’s stock imagery of children online, and there’s naked adults online, so a model can combine the two.
mayoi@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Models already cannot display anything that doesn’t exist yet.
papertowels@lemmy.one 10 months ago
Your claims backbone is that models don’t know the differences between a child’s naked body and an adults, yes?
What happens if you ask chat gpt “what are the anatomical differences between human and adult bodies?”
I’m sure it’ll give you an accurate response.
mayoi@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Oh wow a text model built from text written by humans can parrot what text written by humans says…
Now get it to write something original.
Player2@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
Just like all the words you used to compose that sentence already existed and yet you made it yourself, language models can take tokens that they know generally go together and make original sentences. Your argument is that a dictionary exists, therefore authors are lying to everyone by saying that they wrote something.
Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 10 months ago
👆 Sarcasm and condescension
Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
You genuinely don’t think CSAM is used in the training of these AI models…? And then you used a chat model to essentially google the differences in text and not visually?..
Why did you feel the need to jump in and defend stuff like this?
Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Didnt they then post a link showing that dall-e could combine two different things into something its never seen before?
Did you read the whole comment? Even if the text model describing things is irrelevant the dall-e part is not.
papertowels@lemmy.one 10 months ago
The original comment said it’s impossible for a model to be able to produce CP if it was never exposed to it.
They were uninformed, so as someone who works with machine learning I informed them. If your argument relies on ignorance it’s bad.
Re: text model, someone already addressed this. If you’re going to make arguments and assumptions about things I share without reading them, there’s no need for me to bother with my time. You can lead a horse to water but you cant make it drink.
Have a good one!