Comment on Monaspace - Microsoft presents a new font family for code

• OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  If the streching is so small as to be unnoticable (and I agree it’s pretty subtle) then I also don’t really understand the benefit.

  Typically, the idea behind this sort of design is that it should be unnoticeable. The motivation is that, with other monospace fonts, the differences in character width, along with the inconsistent spacing and line thicknesses are both noticable and distracting. Some of this badness is avoidable, and this is what this font attempts.

  and yeah that height difference is really weird. That almost seems like a bug.

  I’ve been informed, (and had to double check because I didn’t believe it,) that the two "i"s are actually the exact same height. The first looking larger than the second is an optical illusion. Font design is hard.

  source

  • jeffhykin@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Eh I don’t really buy the noticeable argument. Either it’s not noticeable both ways (doesn’t matter that m is squished all the time) or it’s not noticeable both ways (expanding m doesn’t align).

    Optical Illusion

    Wait no, its the fault of the stretching! I mean yes, the i’s are the same hight (which is shocking, thank you for correcting us on that) but the reason it’s an optical illusion is because the i on the left is wider and wide m exaggerates the thinness of the i on the right! Turn off the stretching and suddenly the i’s look the same height.

    This is what I meant by “feeling like my editor is gaslighting me”

    source