We would need to get to the other side of acceptable for widespread use of autos (self driving vehicles). It’s not an unachievable goal you always try to get closer to. That word is your originally used “ideal”.
It’s not just pedantic. I’m not the only one who thought you said something you apparently now didn’t mean, because you used words you apparently don’t understand. The words you use are vital to your being understood.
You could just humbly admit your origonal mistake in language, and nobody would give you a hard time.
Steve@communick.news 1 year ago
You’re shifting goal posts.
Acceptable is different than ideal.
baggins@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Only if you want it to be.
Steve@communick.news 1 year ago
That’s true. But then you run into the issue of “The perfect being the enemy of the good.”
baggins@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Ok ya pedantic fuck. I edited my comment just for you. I know English is hard to understand.
Steve@communick.news 1 year ago
But now you’re misusing “acceptable”.
We would need to get to the other side of acceptable for widespread use of autos (self driving vehicles). It’s not an unachievable goal you always try to get closer to. That word is your originally used “ideal”.
It’s not just pedantic. I’m not the only one who thought you said something you apparently now didn’t mean, because you used words you apparently don’t understand. The words you use are vital to your being understood.
You could just humbly admit your origonal mistake in language, and nobody would give you a hard time.
baggins@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
I’m misusing “acceptable” because you think I mean something that I didn’t mean? Move along then.