I’m not correcting what you said, I’m correcting what you think I said.
AI could add detail that isn’t there in the film, but it is unnecessary to recover detail that IS there because we absolutely have the tech to get the full detail that is available in the film. No need to make up for lost detail with AI.
Film is also so so insanely high detail, that the idea of enhancing it further never even occurred to me. It’d be utterly pointless.
There is only a contradiction if you interpret my words in a way I didn’t intend.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
Yes, you’d need AI to exceed the level of detail that is in the film… But it never even crossed my mind that you’d want to.
I was simply making the point that AI is unnecessary to match the quality of film, with a digital image.
schmidtster@lemmy.world 1 year ago
See so after insulting me and badgering me that I was incorrect, you missed my point because you couldn’t comprehend the situation where it’s possible. Yet it already is… home videos being scanned and upscaled it’s already a market dude lmfao.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
I don’t even know how to respond to this one… You thought I was saying something I wasn’t, and attempted to call me on a mistake I didn’t make, and my taking offense to that is somehow my bad.
And those scans are being upscaled because old home video formats suck, no one was buying cinema cameras to use as camcorders. And the methods to scan these old formats suck even more, so upscaling has used to create detail to even come close to matching current consumer video formats.
This is no way equivalent to cinema quality film.