Comment

Comment on Google and major mobile carriers want Europe to regulate Apple's iMessage platform

I don’t know why you insist on holding onto a 30+ year old protocol. It’s not perfect and at times it can be downright unreliable. Once it’s left your phone you have no idea if it was successfully delivered or not, there’s no acknowledgement no retrys no retransmits. It just shoots it off and hopes for the best.

Group chats are laughably broken even among all SMS recipients (It was never intended for it anyway) and frankly the bandwidth required for text regardless of if it’s over SMS or RCS is inconsequential, who cares if RCS messages need a bit more bandwidth to send text. The difference is negligible.

source

Sort:hotnew top

BURN@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
That’s why it works so well. What you see as problems with SMS I see as good design decisions. It’s an incredibly simple implementation that does exactly what it’s supposed to. You just want it to do more than it needs to.

Something will eventually replace it, but it sure as hell won’t be RCS. RCS is a defacto google standard now. Many features are locked out if you don’t use google servers. It’s not an open standard and it’s disingenuous to portray it as one.

source
- cm0002@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Uh yea, because we do so much more on our phones, it might be well designed, but it was well designed for the 90s. That’s why it makes a good fallback protocol, but by no means should it be the go-to.
  
  RCS is the replacement, it’s been the replacement for a long time in the EU. In fact, if the US carriers just implemented it when the EU did, this entire thread wouldn’t even exist.
  
  It’s a standard until Google takes control of the GSM Association.
  
  Here’s a Wikipedia article on RCS : en.wikipedia.org/…/Rich_Communication_Services
  
  Even has this blurb:
  
  The Verge in 2019 criticized the inconsistent support of RCS in the United States, with carriers not supporting RCS in all markets, not certifying service on all phones, or not yet supporting the Universal Profile. Concerns were shown over Google’s decision to run its own RCS service due to the possibility of antitrust scrutiny, but it was acknowledged that Google had to do so in order to bypass the carriers’ inconsistent support of RCS, as it wanted to have a service more comparable to Apple’s iMessage service available on Android.
  
  source
  - BURN@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    It’s still not a standard as long as you’re relying on google for the majority of features.
    
    source
    cm0002@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Like I said in the other comment, those features are all present in the Universal Profile which only lacks e2ee and those weird sticker things.
    
    All the things we would want, file transfers, video, high quality pictures, real group chats etc are all present
    
    source