Comment on [deleted]

• gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  the “I” in “AI” is not real intelligence either

  source

  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Well theoretically AI may exist. We just don’t have it yet. Current image generators and LLM are called that but they ain’t it…

    source

    • cricket98@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      How are they not intelligent? You are able to put in arbitrary prompts and its able to return an image constructed to your specifications. Seems you are being pedantic

      source

      • VR20X6@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        There’s a distinction between intelligence and sentience.

        The stuff impressing people right now only has a tiny short term memory and no way of really transferring that short term memory to long term memory, so it’s definitely not something you can characterise as sentience. It is definitely intelligence, though, since it can draw from a very large pretrained set of knowledge with deep relational connections.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        In my language the ability to abstract is part of the definition of intelligence and that’s something no current “AI” can do. To be considered intelligent the program would have to be able to derive solutions for previously unknown problems from it’s current knowledge only.

        source