I agree that from a completeness point of view, the official manual is better (I’ve linked it at the bottom of my post as well), however I’d love to hear your specific thoughts about why you feel this particular article is not good- I’ve tried to include fully interactive examples for the most common tasks I find myself doing with jq everyday. This feedback will help me improve my own skills as well, so I would appreciate it very much.
ishanpage@programming.dev 1 year ago
I agree that from a completeness point of view, the official manual is better (I’ve linked it at the bottom of my post as well), however I’d love to hear your specific thoughts about why you feel this particular article is not good- I’ve tried to include fully interactive examples for the most common tasks I find myself doing with
jqeveryday. This feedback will help me improve my own skills as well, so I would appreciate it very much.AlphaAutist@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I thought it was great in terms of listing examples for common use cases and I appreciated that the commands could be altered and ran interactively.