Science is about thinking. If you’re not the one writing your own research, you’re not the one actually thinking about it and conceptualizing it. The act of writing a research paper is just as important as the paper itself.
Comment on ‘ChatGPT detector’ catches AI-generated papers with unprecedented accuracy
Deckweiss@lemmy.world 1 year agoScience isn’t about writing. It is about finding new data through scientific process and communicating it to other humans.
If a tool helps you do any of it better, faster or more efficiently, that tool should be used.
But I agree with your sentiment when it comes to for example creative writing.
Laticauda@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
sab@kbin.social 1 year ago
Science is also creative writing. We do research and write the results, in something that is an original product. Something new is created; it's creative.
An LLM model is just reiterative. A researcher might feel like they're producing something, but they're really just reiterating. Even if the product is better than what they would have produced themselves it is still more worthless, as it is not original and will not make a contribution that haven't been made already.
And for a lot of researchers, the writing and the thinking blend into each other. Outsource the writing, and you're crippling the thinking.