I will never be totally happy with this situation until they’re required to offer a free version of all the models that were created with unlicensed content.
Comment on AI companies have all kinds of arguments against paying for copyrighted content
tabular@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Then feel free to give your copyrighted AI code a free software license :3
makyo@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
This. If the model and its parameters are open source and under an unrestricted license, they can scrape anything they want in my opinion. But if they make money with someone’s years of work writing a book, then please give that author some money as well.
abhibeckert@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Why? I’ve read many books on programming, and now I work as a programmer. The authors of those books don’t get a percentage of my income just because they spent years writing the book. I’ve also read (and written) plenty of open source code over the years, and learned from that code. That doesn’t mean I have to give money to all the people who contributed to those projects.
Just because you work on something and release it to the world, doesn’t mean you are entitled to make money off it.
OrangeCorvus@lemmy.world 10 months ago
But you bought the books
LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
He might’ve borrowed them from a library.
OpenAI could’ve trained on borrowed ebooks as well
Davin@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Like with most things, consent and intent matter. I went out on Halloween when I was a kid and got free candy, so why is it bad if I break in and steal other people’s candy?
topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 10 months ago
You say you are programmer not writing books about programming. Your argument doesn’t work.