Comment on [deleted]
soumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world 1 year agoYes and no, while i do agree that this is considered normal behaviour, i also long for a world in which we would be able to say “there’s a bombing !” with as much anguish whether its in ‘the U.s.’/Europe, or in the Middle-East, Africa, etc. It’s not that much normal i think
irmoz@reddthat.com 1 year ago
We are able to do that lmao
soumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah no, we don’t , double standard is everywhere.
Just take what’s happening in Palestine if you want the most recent examples, some lives are more important to us than others, there’s a difference between what we proclaim our values to be and our practice of them.
irmoz@reddthat.com 1 year ago
Don’t move the goalposts. You didn’t say we don’t. You said we aren’t able. We absolutely are.
You’re taking a quirk of language and trying to spin some commentary on human nature out of it.
Fuck off with your pseudo-intelelctual bullshit. All the sentence needs is “in Gaza” and you’ll get the response you were looking for. Stop trying to make people hate humanity, thanks.
If your goal is to engender love between “tribes” (stupid fucking word in this age) then stop spreading hate for any reason, even if the reason is that people don’t immediately assume “across the world” when you vaguely refer to events.
soumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Oh, i agree then, except in the case of apology of terrorism/enemies.
some_guy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No “we” don’t, or no you don’t? Seems to me like you just assume everyone is exactly the same kind of bigot as you.
soumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No man, we care much more about deaths in the west than outside of it, e.g. in the u.s.a. instead of Iraq, or Israel instead of Palestine, partly because we divide between supposedly good civilians and evil terrorists with human shields, tsk.