I’d argue that someone making porn of someone their own age is not pedophilia.
Comment on Teen boys use AI to make fake nudes of classmates, sparking police probe
r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 8 months ago
If you’re making porn of real underage people, I have no problem with you being put on the pedo registry.
If no serious harm was done, I’m fine with convicting them and then doing full expungement after 5-10 years.
Jolteon@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 8 months ago
They’re still making porn of a minor. That is harmful to them and it enables any pedophiles who find it.
13esq@lemmy.world 8 months ago
That’s an easy enough judgement when the perpetrator is an adult. What do you do when the perpetrator is a minor themselves? As they are in this article.
Of course their still needs to be some sort of recourse, but for every other crime there is a difference between being tried as a child or being tried as an adult.
I find it tough to consider myself.
r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 8 months ago
Considering the consequences for a high school student if porn of them gets circulated, I’m fine with putting them on the registry. Expungement can happen later based on the aftermath. Teenage girls have killed themselves over this sort of thing.
wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 8 months ago
And youre proof that the pedo registry shouldnt exist as is.
Teenagers being sexually interested in their peers is not pedophilia, and you want to ruin a decade of their life guaranteed, with the “”“”““promise””“”“”" of an expungement that would never actually happen thanks to the permanent nature of the internet for it.
This misuse of AI is a crime and should be punished and deterred, obviously. But labeling children about to enter the world as pedophiles basically for the rest of their lives?
Youre kind of a monster.
r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 8 months ago
What about the fact that the girls who are victims of something like this will have to contend with the pictures being online if someone posts them there? What if people who don’t know that the pictures depict minors re-post them to other sites, making them very difficult to remove? That can cause very serious employablity problems. It doesn’t matter how open minded people are, they don’t want porn coming up if someone googles one of their employees.
wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 8 months ago
The creation is still a crime, no one said otherwise.
It is just not an act of pedophilia.
r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 8 months ago
If you produce CP, you should be on a registry for producing and distributing CP. If you create CP, you are enabling pedophilia.
wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 8 months ago
They are children. Being horny about classmates.
Being sexually aroused by people your own age and wishing to fantasize about it is not enabling pedophilia, you literal psychopath.
r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 8 months ago
Circulating porn of minors is a crime and enables pedophiles. Not to mention teenage girls could easily commit suicide over something like this.