The official self-hosted Bitwarden server does support SSO.
Comment on Bitwarden passkey support starts rolling out through the browser extension
thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 1 year agothere is an official self hosted bitwarden server. It doesn’t support SSO, I guess time will tell if it supports this.
trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Contend6248@feddit.de 1 year ago
It’s bare minimum, not even 2FA is working without a premium account.
I was shocked how much more Vaultwarden is providing for free.
Traister101@lemmy.today 1 year ago
I mean Bitwarden wants to make money. 10$ a year to not have to mess about with self hosting (however beneficial that might be) is a pretty good deal.
Contend6248@feddit.de 1 year ago
Yeah, to each their own, half an hour of setup is something i can do myself. Centralized password safes aren’t my favorite thing.
I just think that 2FA is such a must have feature, that it’s weird to put it behind a paywall, all that password-, file- or text-sharing or now passkeys are nice to have and should be paid.
Asudox@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They probably put 2FA behind a paywall because nobody in their right mind would actually want to store 2FA and their passwords behind one account in the same storage. I suppose you can see the problem.