I assume these models are being run on servers.
Comment on Teens exploited by fake nudes illustrate threat of unregulated AI
Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 year agoYou need a hell of a lot more computer power to run a llm than you do photoshop.
paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 year ago
theterrasque@infosec.pub 1 year ago
Which server run model allows pornography of this type?
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
While true, you can generate AI images with a potato, it just takes longer. For my setup, RTX 3060 generates the basic image in around 10 seconds while running on CPU only takes around five minutes, but the result is exactly the same.
rar@discuss.online 1 year ago
Do the files exactly match to their hashes? I wonder if there’s a fundamental difference generated by using different hardwares.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 year ago
AI always generate different outputs for the same input (AI appears to be non-deterministic) so it would be impossible to confirm that exactly.
But I suppose what they mean is they appear to be of the same quality. Taking a longer time does not appear to decrease the quality of the output.
I suppose you could give an AI the same input resetting it after each input and then use statistical models to identify common traits. Then do the same thing on different hardware and run the same statistical analysis and see if there is a difference between group A in group B but as far as I’m aware no one has done this.
In theory hardware shouldn’t matter, it’s all mathematics basically and one plus one is always equal two, so there shouldn’t be any fluctuations.
rar@discuss.online 1 year ago
Yes, I suppose given equal input (model, keyword, seed, etc.) two Stable Diffusion installs should output same images; what I am curious about is whether the hardware configuration (e.g. gpu manufacturers) could result in traceable variations. As abuse of this tech gains prominence, tracing back the producer of a certain synthetic media by the specific hardware combination could become a thing.