Comment on AI one-percenters seizing power forever is the real doomsday scenario, warns AI godfather

• PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  If we have to choose between corporations or the government ruling us with AI I think I’m gonna just take a bullet.

  source

  • Kedly@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Anarchy with never exist as anything but the exception to the rule, governments are a form of power that the population can at least influence. Weaker government will always mean stronger either nobility or corporations

    source

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      We’re failing at influencing now.

      You may think you’re choosing the best yoke, but I’d prefer none.

      source

      • Kedly@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Maybe in the future we can go back to smaller tribes/groups of people that take care of each other, but in the world as it exists today? An entity will come by sooner or later to conquer said group. We influence our government FAR better than we influence a corporation or dictator. Right now we need an equalizing big power, and at least with democratic governments, these big powers at least have to pretend to work for their people. Which, again, corporations and dictators do not

        source
• zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Any AI safety experts that believes these oligarchs are going to get AGI and not some monkey paw are also drinking the cool aide.

  source

  • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Actually AI safety experts are worried that corporations are just interested in getting technology that achieves specific ends, and don’t care that it is dangerous or insufficiently tested. Our rate of industrial disasters kinda demonstrates their views regarding risk.

    For now, we are careening towards giving smart drones autonomy to detect, identify, target and shoot weapons at enemies long before they’re smart enough to build flat-packed furniture from the IKEA visual instructions.

    source