Comment on Interesting how artists don't make enough money from their creations, so our solution is to make certain information illegal to share, rather than give them a universal basic income.
your Samsung example is trademark. it’s not copyright.
Because I wanted one that’s not about art, but the priciple is the same.
trademark has nothing to do with copyright. they’re two sets of laws that developed a two different times for two different reasons.
So, what does that have to do with the exclusive rights vs monopoly discussion?
trademark is a consumer protection. copyright is a fucking monopoly.
shrugal@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Because I wanted one that’s not about art, but the priciple is the same.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
trademark has nothing to do with copyright. they’re two sets of laws that developed a two different times for two different reasons.
shrugal@lemm.ee 1 year ago
So, what does that have to do with the exclusive rights vs monopoly discussion?
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
trademark is a consumer protection. copyright is a fucking monopoly.