Comment on Leica camera has built-in defense against misleading AI, costs $9,125
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 11 months ago… I literally just explained that a lot of those photos are crowd sourced. Which gets back to needing more or less universal adoption. And even then: Maybe I’ll give CNN a picture of a republican beating a child if I can strip the metadata. I am not giving that if it is going to trace back to me.
OneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.org 11 months ago
So then news orgs who care about provenance have to stop copying social media posts and treating them like well-researched journalism. Seems like a win to me.
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
Sure. That is what is happening…
OneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.org 11 months ago
You gave an example of TMZ sourcing photos from randos, but they’re likely not the target customer for this tech. If they cared about integrity they wouldn’t be reporting celebrity gossip.
For news companies posting syndicated images, then those come from a cadre of photographers who are most likely to own the newest most expensive cameras. Surely it’s not inconceivable that as this tech rolls out more, Agence-France-Presse, Getty, or AP could require all photos submitted to them to have this metadata, thus passing the benefits along to any news agency using their images.
If you’re talking about photo sources taken from everyday people, then yes: They won’t have this technology in the short term, maybe not ever. Then again, I don’t get my news from TMZ.
I think blockchain is dumb because it fails to achieve its stated goals while also harming society. I think this is a system with marginal use case and minimal licensing overhead to integrate into future cameras, so overall my take is “not dumb” and “probably useful”.