Bold statement from someone who is literally just saying things and posted nothing to validate their claims.
Comment on AI-created child sexual abuse images ‘threaten to overwhelm internet’
MTK@lemmy.world 1 year agoCare to explain or do you just like to say things?
Rouxibeau@lemmy.world 1 year ago
MTK@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I work with LLMs, SD and Threa Intelligence so I have some professional knowledge on the subject.
Rouxibeau@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That fails to rise to the level of verification. The expert witness must convince the jury that they are in fact an expert.
MTK@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Dude this isn’t a court room, I said what I said and you can decide to ignore it if you want to.
dabu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
To simplify:
If you want to generate an image of a Lion in a tuxedo it didn’t necessary need to parse images of lions in a tuxedo.
MTK@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You are talking about technicalities. For a model to be as good as possible you train on the most accurate data.
It is true that you can take SD, modify it to ignore moral values and then ask for CSAM but if you for example have a bunch of real CSAM and you train it on that data it would be much much better at generating believable CSAM. Which is what these criminals do…