But it is true, what’s up with these creep comments defending a fucking child porn generation machine.
Comment on AI-created child sexual abuse images ‘threaten to overwhelm internet’
DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 1 year agoNot necessarily true.
Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
MTK@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Care to explain or do you just like to say things?
dabu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
To simplify:
If you want to generate an image of a Lion in a tuxedo it didn’t necessary need to parse images of lions in a tuxedo.
MTK@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You are talking about technicalities. For a model to be as good as possible you train on the most accurate data.
It is true that you can take SD, modify it to ignore moral values and then ask for CSAM but if you for example have a bunch of real CSAM and you train it on that data it would be much much better at generating believable CSAM. Which is what these criminals do…
Rouxibeau@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Bold statement from someone who is literally just saying things and posted nothing to validate their claims.
MTK@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I work with LLMs, SD and Threa Intelligence so I have some professional knowledge on the subject.
Rouxibeau@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That fails to rise to the level of verification. The expert witness must convince the jury that they are in fact an expert.