Comment

Comment on Cruise Self-Driving License Revoked After It Withheld Pedestrian Injury Footage, DMV Says

TWeaK@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

Yes but for that to stick there has to be a clear obligation to present everything. Frankly, I don’t think they lost their licence because of the omission, but because of what happened - this article is just trying to make the story more dramatic. Even the title subtly implies this, the licence wasn’t revoked “because” it withheld footage, but “after”.

source

Sort:hotnew top

wahming@monyet.cc ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

Yes but for that to stick there has to be a clear obligation to present everything

Anybody reasonable reading the article understands the obligation is there.

source
- TWeaK@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Yeah a reasonable person would decide that on the balance of probabilities here, but we’re talking about the process through which a licence is revoked, which needs to be more concrete.
  
  source
  - wahming@monyet.cc ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    The actual document from the DMV lists the omission as one of the reasons.
    
    During the meeting on October 3. 2023. Cruise failed to disclose that the AV executed a pullover maneuver that increased the risk of, and may have caused, further injury to a pedestrian. Cruise’s omission hinders the ability of the department to effectively and timely evaluate the safe operation of Cruise’s vehicles and puts the safety of the public at risk
    
    source