Comment on This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI

• vidarh@lemmy.stad.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  As long as people aren’t ready for it, then it doesn’t solve the immediate problem that needs to be solved today.

  source
• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Lol.

  How does UBI break trademark and copyright law (and therefore legal cases)?

  Do you really think the current power brokers will suddenly sit in their hands and stop trying to (mostly successfully) control as much as they can?

  source

  • Zeth0s@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    UBI is needed because most of the jobs people are currently doing are already not needed. They are needed just to redistribute wealth, but most of the jobs are useless (if you work in corporate, public sector or retail you know what I am talking about). In the future more will become useless. Current copyright laws are already outdated and don’t work anymore. Only safe solution for people who want to dedicate their lives to visual art is UBI. Because of the known reasons. Most “artists” are not really doing art, simply a job that in the future will be done by less people. As it is already happening now, even before AI.

    UBI is a solution for this situations, that will be even more common in future. We need better solution to redistribute wealth, from what you call “power brokers” to larger society

    source