Comment on This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI
regbin_@lemmy.world 11 months agoDisagree. It’s only unethical if you use it to generate the artist’s piece and claim it as yours.
Comment on This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI
regbin_@lemmy.world 11 months agoDisagree. It’s only unethical if you use it to generate the artist’s piece and claim it as yours.
MamboGator@lemmy.world 11 months ago
9thSun@midwest.social 11 months ago
I don’t see how AI training couldn’t be considered transformative as the whole idea is to consume input, break it down into data, and output something new. The way I’m understanding what you’re saying is like this: Instead of only paying royalties when I try to monetize a cover song, I’d have to pay every time I practiced it.
MamboGator@lemmy.world 11 months ago
9thSun@midwest.social 11 months ago
I don’t understand how you’re separating the the generated artworks from the AI that’s generating the work, but I do see your point. If a company puts out a tool for free I don’t think they should be on the hook for someone using that and creating a product. At the end of it all though, I think whoever has made any hard financial gains should should payout whoever contributed.