Im afraid if we keep sharing this, they might take a dive too.
Comment on Has HP printers always been this bad?
Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 1 year agoRule 4. If you absolutely need to, buy a Brother.
all4one@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
uberkalden@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Brother inkjet really aren’t better than HP. I have one and the scanner doesn’t work if the ink is out. And it reports no ink waaaay too early. I can trick it into printing longer and almost double the life of the cartridges.
Maybe brother laser jet is better? I’m sure hp laser is too though
Whattrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
HP laser is still markedly worse than Brother laser. Much more expensive toner, harder to find and use off-brands, and (in my experience) much higher failure rates.
In general, toner is more robust than inkjet, but also HP is worse than Brother.
uis@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Don’t bother, buy Brother.
Whyyyy, brain? Why?
abhibeckert@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This. Every brother laser printer I’ve ever owned has worked perfectly aside from the occasional cartridge/etc change.