Comment on The FCC is Expected to Propose the Return of Net Neutrality Protections Oct 19th

• jordanlund@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’ll see if I can make it more sense for you:

  If you argue that the pathways that make up the internet should not be artifically restricted or gated as a means of shuttibg down competition, while at the same time turning around and shutting down your own public pathways, that’s a huge problem.

  source

  • Nougat@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Setting aside for the moment the fact that net neutrality has to do with IP traffic (layer 3, network) and not API availability (layer 7, application) --

    Reddit's API is not a "public pathway." It is a private gateway into the reddit environment. They can charge whatever they like for it, because it is a part of their application.

    The way they went about changing to their current fee model was undeniably shitty, and yeah, they're trying to prop up ahead of IPO. None of that has anything to do with net neutrality. You're wrong on this one, time to let it go.

    source

    • CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Reddit’s API is not a “public pathway.” It is a private gateway into the reddit environment. They can charge whatever they like for it, because it is a part of their application.

      Not saying that you are wrong, legally, and not to relitigate the whole thing again, but if you offer a public facing API and then you later on just withdraw it (or its functionality) altogether, that’s something a business should not do to its customer base ever, for ethical and social contract reasons.

      The Internet is not just defined by legal systems, it started with ethical social contract systems. More nebulous than legal, yes, but still, Society does follow them and expects companies to do so as well.

      source
  • Stumblinbear@pawb.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    There’s a world of difference between the road itself and the people who own the cars.

    source