Comment

gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

So you’d rather they get birthed and slowly starve rather than just not be born?

If you don’t support social programs to help people when they’re alive then you’re a massive hypocrite, as you’re just letting them die a slower and more painful death, which most would consider the inhumane thing to do

source

Sort:hotnew top

Blamemeta@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
For the record, I did not argue for no welfare. I said that the argument was stupid. Its perfectly logical to say “I’m anti-murder but not pro-welfare.”

Imo, we need welfare, especially for babies and children.

Hell, you can give a lot of reasons. Theres even one for feminists. I forget the exact wording I heard, but it hinges on the lack of mens reproductive rights, and women being equal to men.

Men are considered smart enough and responsible enough to not fuck unless they want to risk children. Women are not stupid, they are just as smart and responsible as men.

source
- webadict@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Your post history indicates that you hate minorities, so that doesn’t feel like a point you believe in, but I don’t think you believe in anything, so there is that.
  
  source
  - Blamemeta@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Wtf are you talking about? What comment have I made that hates minorities?
    
    Fucking “indicates”, is that the new version of dogwhistle?
    
    source
- gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  
  Its perfectly logical to say “I’m anti-murder but not pro-welfare.”
  
  Only if you ignore the context that said “murder” being stopped will result in the need for welfare. In that case you’re 100% right
  
  Too bad reality doesn’t ignore context as easily as cuckservatives such as yourself
  
  source
- AnonTwo@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  
  For the record, I did not argue for no welfare.
  .
  Its perfectly logical to say “I’m anti-murder but not pro-welfare.”
  
  I dunno, I'd say if you say both in the same sentence, you probably haven't actually cared enough to consider wellfare to counteract your "anti-murder" stance
  
  So it's perfectly fair to say that what you are arguing would lead to unnecessary death just from your negligence to follow through.
  
  source