Comment on New York Bill Would Require a Criminal Background Check to Buy a 3D Printer
Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 11 months ago
What the fuck? You dont even need that for buying a fucking knife
Comment on New York Bill Would Require a Criminal Background Check to Buy a 3D Printer
Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 11 months ago
What the fuck? You dont even need that for buying a fucking knife
HuddaBudda@kbin.social 11 months ago
I think some people would say the ability to print a gun is more deadly then a knife.
But I kind of agree with you.
If we start licensing people to own stuff that has the potential to do harm, then eventually you are going to run into a never ending list of household items and laws of natural physics:
grue@lemmy.world 11 months ago
HuddaBudda@kbin.social 11 months ago
A surprising enlightening read. Thank you for sharing.
cryptiod137@lemmy.world 11 months ago
99% of the what I’ve seen is more deadly to the user than to anyone on the receiving end. You’d really be better off with a pipe pistol or shotgun.
But yeah, almost anything could be dangerous depending on how it’s applied.
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
If you’ve only seen the liberator and the harlot, the hoffman lowers and FGC9_2 0s? Well…
cryptiod137@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Looked into the ones you mentioned, both require non-printed parts.
Those are better than what I had seen, but aren’t even on the same scale as what someone can make with a mil or a lathe casually in a couple days
PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [bot] 11 months ago
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Propane
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Blamemeta@lemm.ee 11 months ago
We already do that, with guns. Precendent is set.
HuddaBudda@kbin.social 11 months ago
The understandable difference being that a gun has but one purpose: Kill people.
Whereas everything else I have mentioned, including 3d printers are multi-purpose. Not intended to kill, but to serve multiple roles.
Though, it is a good point that few devices could be cobbled together to make infinite guns so long as you had material. So I am not saying it isn't a class of it's own, just where does the logic end with that point?
Is it only legal for a company to print guns? How does a license alone protect people? I don't think that is something I could answer.
Blamemeta@lemm.ee 11 months ago
The thing is, banning guns is giving them an inch. NYC is already trying to grab 3d printers. Hell the ATF infamously made showlaces into unregistered machine guns, and a felony. everydaynodaysoff.com/…/shoestring-machine-gun/
And abroad, the UK went after knives.
Never think they’ll stop at guns, because they won’t. Its slippery slope, but that slope is supported by historical evidence.