Comment on CGNAT blocking external access to NAS. Looking to address this plus more.

• thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Honestly, I cannt believe it.

  Double or triple check it. The problem these days is to get a semifucntianl ipv4, they are expensive, scarce and full of problems.

  Ipv6 on the contrary is abundant and all enterprise equipment fully support it since decades.

  source

  • Aganim@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I can totally believe it. Here in the Netherlands we still have providers that haven’t implemented IPv6. We’ve had one (Delta) finally starting their IPv6 rollout to fiber customers this year, not sure if they already finished it. Some providers are just slow AF unfortunately.

    source

    • thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Truly incredible, shame on the.

      Question then.

      Are you experimenting some kind of connections problems?

      I ask because I know some multiplayer games make a heavy use of the ipv6. Steam have some servers that are not reachable via ipv4, and don’t speak about vps…

      source

      • Aganim@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Can’t answer that I’m afraid. My current provider fully supports IPv6, as did their predecessor, so my network has been dual-stack for years.

        source
  • wjs018@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    My isp doesn’t support ipv6 in my area (Verizon). They claim to be in the process of rolling it out, but it’s been years that they have been saying that, so idk. At least they don’t use CGNAT, so it isn’t a huge deal for me after I set up dynamic DNS.

    source
• 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  CGNAT but no IPv6? Despicable

  source

  • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It’s Mexico. The ISPs incredibly worthless and corrupt

    source

    • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      My condolences :(

      source