Comment on Semantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski)

Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• ummthatguy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Yeah, him too. Look, I had 6 spots and several shows to cover.

  source

  • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Fair enough, I would have given any name that wasn’t on the list, I mean, Tom Paris was a doc for a short bit, right? (My collectors plate has it in a footnote)

    source

    • ummthatguy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Field medic with basic training.

      Image

      source

      • setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Inflammable means flammable? What a starship.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • marcos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Well, if I was deemed a criminal by the act of existing, I wouldn’t care a lot about ethics either.

    source