Comment on Australia fines Musk's X platform $386,000 over anti-child abuse gaps

• squiblet@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  They said

  X's noncompliance was more serious, the regulator said, including failure to answer questions about how long it took to respond to reports of child abuse, steps it took to detect child abuse in livestreams and its numbers of content moderation, safety and public policy staff.

  So yes, all the questions need to be at least addressed and probably saying “we don’t do that because Elron doesn’t care about it” wouldn’t suffice either.

  source

  • blazera@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Cool, see my first comment again

    source

    • squiblet@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      You mean, is the Fediverse doing any better? Why would I need to read that again?

      source

      • blazera@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        because we've gone in a circle of me asking if the site we are on right now is doing anything better with regards to this problematic material, since folks seem to care about Twitters failure to address it themselves. You respond that it's not about their lack of addressing the material, but they're lack of a response to the regulatory inquiry. I point out that they did respond, and your response is that oh they actually need to have a good answer of how they are addressing the material. Which is the same premise as the article and what my first comment was about. It's hypocrisy, because the standard isnt being applied to the fediverse, no one is up in arms about our lack of automatic detection of problematic material or surveillance of private messaging. Because we care about privacy when we're not being blinded by well intentioned Musk hate.

        source

        • -> View More Comments