Comment on William Wallace didn’t look like that
CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
In 2009, the film was second on a list of “most historically inaccurate movies” in The Times.[66] In the humorous non-fictional historiography An Utterly Impartial History of Britain (2007), author John O’Farrell claims that Braveheart could not have been more historically inaccurate, even if a Plasticine dog had been inserted in the film and the title changed to “William Wallace and Gromit”.[74]