Comment on Referendum Results, Congratulations, Comiserations
DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 11 months agoIt’s not another toothless advisory panel.
It would’ve been a constitutionally supported advisory, with demonstrated will of the Australian people. That wouldn’t be so easily ignored.
Whirlybird@aussie.zone 11 months ago
It literally would be another toothless advisory panel because it was not going to have any power. Being constitutionally supported just means it has to exist in some unspecified form. There was no “demonstrated will of the Australian people” in it.
You know what does have the demonstrated will of the Australian people? That the proposed voice was a bad idea. That shouldn’t be ignored.
DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 11 months ago
Come on mate, obviously there would have been demonstrated will if the referendum was upheld.