Comment on Clarence Thomas Wants to Go After Freedom of the Press
PizzaMan@lemmy.world 1 year agoNo, he needs to mention it to be relevant. You can’t put words in his mouth.
That’s not how language works. If I’m talking about water infrastructure, damns are relevant even if I never said the word.
It is not the government dampening free speech
So you’re basically just boiling it down to “Nu uh”. Wow you sure have me convinced.
Perhaps in the future you could at least attempt to address the argument.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 year ago
No, I am boiling down to facts. I know you don’t like facts, but the fact is has nothing to do with free speech.
You don’t have an argument to address. You are making up some weird, illogical fallacy that no sane person would attempt to address.
It has nothing to do with the topic. It has nothing to do with Thomas and only shows you don’t understand free speech.
PizzaMan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Don’t worry, you already had me convinced. All you had to do was call me stupid.
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I never called you stupid. You demonstrated that.
PizzaMan@lemmy.world 1 year ago