Comment on Utah sues TikTok, alleging it lures children into addictive and destructive social media habits
paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 1 year agothey implied the root comment was saying that two things couldn’t be bad or only one could be solved.
I don’t agree with that interpretation.
They simply stated that ranking things by “badness” also implies a ranking in terms of which one of those bad things is more urgent and should be addressed first - not that one thing was bad and that the other want, or that only one thing could be solved.
killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s a bad interpretation but you are, or course, welcome to it
paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m merely reiterating the position of the poster you replied to.
You can disagree with that position, but you seemed to be replying to a position that nobody was even taking.
killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I am not, you just haven’t understood the position. But that’s fine.
paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You were clearly arguing against a position that nobody here took.
That means you either lack the reading comprehension to understand what was stated, or you’re purposefully creating a strawman to argue against.