Comment on Utah sues TikTok, alleging it lures children into addictive and destructive social media habits
paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 8 months agoYou were clearly arguing against a position that nobody here took.
That means you either lack the reading comprehension to understand what was stated, or you’re purposefully creating a strawman to argue against.
killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’ve explained in detail, you’ve not understood the explanation and taken an illogical stance.
I can’t help you out of a hole you’ve put yourself in. It’s okay to disagree though, you don’t have to lower yourself to ad hominems.
paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Why complain about ad hominems after attacking me? You’re the one who lowered the level of the discourse - why are you complaining now?
killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Can you quote where I attacked you?
paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Of course, I’d be happy to!
It was when you questioned my comprehension of the argument that was being made instead of the argument itself by saying “you just haven’t understood the position.”
That’s literally an ad hominem.