Feels like your services there just makes http links with extra steps?
Why would I want to use IPFS with those services instead of just online hosting?
Comment on Making a Simple Self-Hosted Photo Gallery With IPFS
rglullis@communick.news 11 months agothe idea that people will share your data benevolent right?
Not necessarily. There are a good number of providers (e.g, Pinata, Infura) of “Pinning services”, which will host the data that you want to make sure it’s always available. At first sight, they might seem more expensive than just using something like S3, but if you consider that there is no egress costs for files on IPFS then it might end up a lot cheaper to host content there.
Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 11 months ago
rglullis@communick.news 11 months ago
Because you won’t be paying for distribution.
If you are just hosting data for yourself, sure, go ahead and stick with a regular storage provider. IPFS is useful for the cases where there will be many people who will be accessing that data. The more popular a file is, the more nodes in the swarm will have it and the less it will be requested from your node specifically.
Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 11 months ago
So like torrenting?
rglullis@communick.news 11 months ago
If you could get a torrent file to display an image in your web browser, yes.
Chreutz@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Yes, very much like torrents
Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 11 months ago
If I share data on an online hosting I also doesn’t pay more for distribution? Or is this for some special cases? I havent checked for a long time but I had over 800Mb in like 2010 at OVH and I don’t think it has gone exacty down …
chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 11 months ago
If cost is a reason for concern, then the 5c/GB storage and 8c/GB egress on Pinata isn’t exactly cheaper than S3’s 2.7c/GB storage and 9c/GB egress. You can get much better mileage with something like Backblaze B2 0.6c/GB storage free egress, and couple with CloudFlare or other CDN for much lower egress (often free).
rglullis@communick.news 11 months ago
Sure there will be cheaper alternatives (Storj is $0.04 GB stored + $0.007 GB egress), but with IPFS you can e.g, seed from your own home server and not becoming a bottleneck.