Comment on Samsung joins Google in RCS shaming Apple
Salamendacious@lemmy.world 11 months agoBy saying “apple puts their services” it implied to me that you were suggesting that apple actually put much of its inhouse software on Android, which isn’t the case. Not in the same way that saying “Google puts its services on iOS” is accurate because a great deal of Google’s software is available on iOS.
In our conversation who is saying anything about altruism? What I said was Google releases a lot of, in my opinion, incredibly useful software for free and then pays for it by selling ads. I feel like this is incredibly obvious and for me it’s a good deal because I like Google’s free services and I’d rather see ads about things I might actually be interested in than things I’m not interested in.
Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 11 months ago
What is business model that justifies putting iMessage on Google phones, or supporting one of its competitors?
Because if there’s isn’t one, they can’t do it.
As I said, Google aren’t doing us because they’re your mate, they’re doing it to make money.
Companies are not your friend.
Salamendacious@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Who here is saying that any company is your friend?
Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 11 months ago
You’ve avoided my question. What is the business driver for Apple to do this?
Salamendacious@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Apple can do whatever it wants. Currently they want to keep a barrier between Android and Apple users as a strategy for driving iphone sales.
A reason could be just to create a better experience for its users. Currently Apple to Android messages are SMS and MMS, which are unencrypted. Apple could ensure the security of its users’ messages by implementing RCS, which has E2E encryption.