Comment on Samsung joins Google in RCS shaming Apple

• Yawnder@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  No idea, but that has nothing to do with anything. Considering that the standard is public and free (unlike ISO stuff bte), that most relevant telecoms support it, and that a lot of phone manufacturers have a custom client that does support it, it’s not remotely close to being closed sourced, and service-authentication-gated like iMessages.

  source

  • Natanael@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    However access to each carrier gateway is very guarded …

    source

    • Yawnder@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Not sure what your point is, but ok?

      source
• ubermeisters@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Believe it or not you might need to pay for something that you like and use. Wierd fuckin notion I know

  source

  • Emerald@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Believe it or not you might need to pay for something that you like and use. Wierd fuckin notion I know.

    You are confusing open source with free-as-in-price. Open source is a development philosophy, not a price tag.

    source

    • ubermeisters@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I’m not confusing it, I’m just used to them being paired. Ya know… FOSS… as are others.

      source

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        The “Free” in “Free and Open Source Software” is, famously, “free as in speech, not free as in beer.”

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Probably. Have a look on FDroid.

  source