I’d say the condom thing is also because it raises the risk level considerably, not just because it was dishonest. It’s not just the act they didn’t consent to but the risk of unnoticed m unprotected sex.
BUT, by that token the risk level of having your sex-acts put on the internet for potential millions to see - including family members, potential employers, etc - is still considerable. It can ruin lives in different but still very significant ways.
These scum deserve to be stuffed in a cell.
uranibaba@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Not sure if I would label uploading the videos after saying not to as rape, it feels more along the lines of mental torture but with a better word for it. I guess that rape is a form of torture at the end of day, so still the same?
This is rape.
mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 year ago
The company lied about the public uploads, never used the company’s actual name, had fake “previous models” that vouched for the vidoes being private, and even had the cameraman say that he would never shoot “public” porn. They would lie to teh models about what was in the contracts, and never gave them copies. They also specifically targeted 18-20yr olds to mske sure the women were as naive as possbile.
The founder also had a separate website that published most of the models real names publically.
Coercing/lying/tricking/forcing someone into a type of sex that they otherwise would not have had willing is cut and dry rape.