More data fixes that flaw, not less.
Comment on BBC will block ChatGPT AI from scraping its content
netchami@sh.itjust.works 1 year agoBut ChatGPT often takes correct and factual sources and adds a whole bunch of nonsense and then spits out false information. That’s why it’s dangerous. Just go to the fucking news websites and get your information from there. You don’t need ChatGPT for that.
guacupado@lemmy.world 1 year ago
netchami@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Not too long ago, ChatGPT didn’t know what year it is. You’re telling me it needs more data than it already has to figure out the current year? I like AI for certain things (mostly some programming/scripting stuff) but you definitely don’t need it to read the news.
ours@lemmy.film 1 year ago
Yes. The LLM doesn’t know what year it currently is, it needs to get that info from a service and then answer.
It’s a Large **Language ** Model. Not an actual sentient being.
netchami@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
That’s a fucking lame excuse. AI is not reliable, and you definitely shouldn’t use it to get your news.
CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It is not “a flaw”, it is the way language learning models work. They try to replicate how humans write by guessing based on a language model. It has no knowledge of what is a fact or not, and that is why using LLMs to do research or use them as a search engine is both stupid and dangerous
Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 1 year ago
His would it hallucinate information from an article you gave it
CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It does not hallucinate, it guesses based on the model to make you think the text could be written by a human. Personal experience when I ask into summarize a text. It has errors in it, and sometimes it adds stuff to it. Same if you for instance ask it to make an alphabetic a list of X numbers of items. It may add random items.
Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
It’s not more data, the underlying architecture isn’t designed for handling facts
Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You just described news
echodot@feddit.uk 1 year ago
So they have automated Fox then.
netchami@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Yeah, pretty much.