Comment on [deleted]
Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 year agoPaying for services is fine, profit is the problem. Covering costs is all I want. No need for any agenda or hidden user costs. Just providing a service that people actually want to use.
Comment on [deleted]
Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 year agoPaying for services is fine, profit is the problem. Covering costs is all I want. No need for any agenda or hidden user costs. Just providing a service that people actually want to use.
rglullis@communick.news 1 year ago
Why is profit a problem? How do you account for the cost of the labor of the developers, or the time spent by volunteers?
Why isn’t that deserving of profit?
Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If we’re talking about my dream, that is my dream. A platform that isn’t trying to make money. It’s not wrong to want to make money, but a platform that is trying to make money isn’t my dream platform.
rglullis@communick.news 1 year ago
I think that my argument here is that “the platform” doesn’t exist. The fediverser (much like the internet) is not made of one single entity that defines it’s direction.
Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Maybe I missed some context to the question, but I didn’t know my ideal social media platform had to be something that already existed.