Comment on Just wanted to thank this community for helping me have the best birthday I've had in years
Stamets@startrek.website 1 year agoThey at least referenced the Defiant Mirror Universe stuff. Whole time in the MU trying to find that data only for it to be useless.
Season 3 and 4 have references to EVERY Star Trek that came before it due to quirks of how the show is going.
I do plead for you to give it another chance. The first season is rough, I will not lie, but the Second Season steps up immensely. Season 3 it really has it’s footing and is sprinting (they did a ton of filming in Iceland and it looks GORGEOUS) and Season 4 is just truly fucking incredible. Also there is Saru ass lol
Infynis@midwest.social 1 year ago
Do they improve on Burnham’s character? I could not stand her.
Stamets@startrek.website 1 year ago
That depends on what your issue with her is I guess. What about her didn’t you like? Or rather what do you hope they’d change or work on?
Infynis@midwest.social 1 year ago
She was like the textbook definition of a Mary Sue. Weird name, unique powers, family relation to a well-loved character from a previous series, no flaws other than ones that are supposed to make her more endearing, etc.
Really the main thing I’d want changed is real flaws and emotions beyond dislike of authority
Stamets@startrek.website 1 year ago
I really don’t agree with your characterization there.
Her name might be weird to us but this is an alternate future with aliens so a girl being called Michael is not that strange. Nor would I say it’s a calling card of a Mary Sue. She doesn’t have any unique powers at all either. She’s just flat human woman. Being related to a previous character also isn’t really the hallmark of a Mary Sue. As for no flaws, she has an enormous amount. I would also say that she doesn’t even have a dislike of authority. She has a problem with managing her own authority and overstepping others. When given an order she’ll comply, mostly. There are a handful of instances in which she doesn’t and there are massive repercussions for that. Her flaws run pretty deep. Emotional insecurity and emotional instability due to her upbringing. A problem with not knowing when to stop to the point that she has endangered herself or the crew on a few occasions. She makes rash decisions. She doesn’t ask for help when she needs it and she often rejects help when it’s given. She will take on responsibility for herself that is unnecessary. Spock even makes fun of that in Season 2.
I also disagree with the characterization of ‘Mary Sue’ because she’s not the sole person to fix everything. She has never been the sole person to fix everything. She is a person who fixes things but she’s a part in the machine. Throughout Season 3 and 4 you get to see a lot more of the other crew and spend time with them instead of Michael, but they were still there making the massive decisions that made an impact in Season 1 and 2. We just didn’t know them as well. If anything, Michael is the antithesis of a Mary Sue simply because she’s the person who causes so many problems in Season 1.
Honestly I don’t think you’d like Season 3 or 4 if you already seem to hate every fiber of the character.