Pretty sure he meant something like “not a nonprofit or government entity.”
Comment on Strava just killed its free API, will require a subscription if you want to build on top of it
iamthetot@piefed.ca 3 weeks agoPublic companies are almost more likely to do this, no? They have shareholders to appease instead of just private interests.
grue@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
nykula@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Nonprofits and government entities are just as happy to fuck you over, in my and relatives’ experience.
Mountainaire@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Huh? Are we not all trying to promote Lemmy and reduce Reddit’s power? What examples do you have? Being nonprofit and especially FOSS is a huge factor.
nykula@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
NGOs advertising themselves as offering legal help to vulnerable people promise help and later do nothing but saying in the media how helpful they are, or refuse said help. Playing bureaucratic football when the person is question is member of multiple vulnerable groups: why you go here for help, go there. Other NGOs trying to take control of grassroots youth movements after offering to help with some resources. More NGOs serving as PR vehicles of their solo leaders while pretending to advance human rights. Names: Insight, KyivPride, LGBT Military, EcoAction, many of them tbh, because it’s all the same “community”.
Regarding government entities, there are constant attempts, for years, by state companies providing water, to write generated or fake values for previous month so that you can’t report correct lower values and have to pay more. Do we consider police a government entity? Haven’t helped a single time, but harassed more than once.
About Reddit, I haven’t used it much and I can’t say anything about it besides it not very interesting. Lemmy developers are notorious assholes when it comes to anything about my country, so I’m not trying to promote it. I use other fedi tech because I like it and contribute.
grue@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
“Just as” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there, IMO. Can they be subverted against the people they are supposed to serve? Of course. Is it as likely as a for-profit corporation doing it? Hell no, I’d say.
nykula@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Depends on how they’re organized. If they’re accountable to their community, organized with as little hierarchy as possible, and have rotation of leadership while filling its roles from the members, they’re good. But it’s very rare. If the heads are appointed top-down by the government or self-selected, which is more common, there arise same issues as with companies.
They mean go use NGOs.
For profit companies should be illegal