Comment

Comment on DOJ finally posted that “embarrassing” court doc Google wanted to hide

Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

results I ask for without ads, without manipulation, without spam, then don’t take that information of what I searched for and apply it to me until the end of days and sell it to everyone and their brother

Image

source

Sort:hotnew top

linearchaos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
LOL.

My selfhosted searxng is close.

source
eestileib@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Willing to pay cash? Check out kagi.

I’m a cheapskate but I’m getting closer every month.

source
- Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  So long as I can de-shittify existing search engines with extensions and ad blockers, I’d have a hard time justifying that expense.
  
  …but I also do not have faith that that “so long as” will remain something I can rely on, so kagi is definitely on my radar just from the few posts I’ve seen about it here.
  
  source
  - eestileib@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Yeah the people who pay rave that it’s better, but there’s a well known effect that you generally think the thing with a higher sticker price is higher quality.
    
    source
    Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Investing into something - with money or otherwise - will develop a bias as well. I vaguely recall reading a study for a sociology class I took ages ago about auto-manufacturers trying to fine-tune their ad targeting. They gathered and were crunching data on which types of people paid the most attention to their ads, and one of the unexpected findings was that is was the people who had already purchased the vehicle being advertised. Apparently there’s this subconscious thing we do where we keep looking for value in decisions we’ve already made, so folks would see the ads, tie it to their own car, and thing “yeah, that’s the good stuff!” lol.
    
    Our brains are weird.
    
    source